Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1296 (AP)

Dindi Balagangadhara Tilak v. The Deputy Executive Engineer,

WP/27938/2013 · 2026-04-20

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010054862013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27938/2013 Between: 1. DINDI BALAGANGADHARA TILAK, S/O SRI KAMESHWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR ON CONTRACT BASIS, BOBBILI MANDAL, BOBBILI R/O GANGULA VEEDHI, BOBBILI - 535 558, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. G. NARAYANA RAO, S/O SRI VENKAT RAO AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR ON CONTRACT BASIS, BOBBILI MANDAL, BOBBILI R/O D.NO. 16-97, GANGULA VEEDHI BOBBILI - 535 558, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HOUSING BADANGI AND BOBBILLI SUB-DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED BOBBILI - 535 558, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 4. THE ZILLA SAMAKYA VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT 5. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD - 500 022 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not allowing / permitting the petitioners to discharge their duties as Temporary Work Inspectors on contract basis in their place of work without any prior notice in writing or any communication thereof as illegal, arbitrary, impermissible under law and further being contrary to the principles of equity and natural justice and further contemplating to displace the petitioners with that-of their own persons of choice without following due procedure of selection etc., and consequently direct the respondents to allow / permit the petitioners to continue to discharge their duties entrusted as Temporary Work Inspectors duly treating the period from 21/07/2013 till they are permitted allow to discharge their duties as duty with all consequential benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 34680 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow / permit the petitioners to continue to work as Temporary Work Inspectors forthwith and to continue to pay theft\ the same remuneration I honorarium being paid attached to the post, pending disposal of writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 159612 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED) 2. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 3. . 4. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents are not allowing the petitioners to discharge their duties as Temporary Work Inspectors on contract basis. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioners were engaged initially on contract basis through an outsourcing agency. It is further submitted that this Court while admitting the writ petition on 26.09.2013 granted interim direction to continue the petitioners as Work Inspectors on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to them, provided there is a need for their services in the department. It is also submitted that the petitioners are working since 30.06.2014 through an outsourcing agency M/s. M.K. Enterprises. Recording the same, no further orders are required to be passed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 21.04.2026 SR