APHC010645302013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12910/2013 Between: 1. V.GOVINDA RAO, S/O.APPA RAO, OCC:COMPUTER OPERATOR, THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED,KOTHAVALASA BRANCH,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, VIZIANAGARAM ,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT,REP.BYITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, KOTHAVALASA BRANCH, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not paying the minimum pay scale to the petitioner for the post of Computer Operator as illegal, arbitrary,and violative of Articler 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Bank to pay the Minimum pay scale to the petitioner for the post of Computer Operator and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15877 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Bank to pay the minimum pay scale to the petitioner for the post of Computer Operator pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 101831 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, in pursuance of the interim direction dated 26.04.2013, the respondents have extended the minimum time scale and that no further orders are required in the writ petition, and prays that the writ petition be closed in terms of the interim direction. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank submits that the minimum time scale was extended and that the petitioner was terminated with effect from 01.07.2015. 3. Recording the submissions, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed in terms of the interim direction. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 08.04.2026 PNS