Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1273 (AP)

K.V.Ramana Rao v. A.P. Grameena Vikas Bank

WP/31120/2013 · 2026-04-08

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010765912013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 31120/2013 Between: 1. K.V.RAMANA RAO, S/O. K. RAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. DONKADA AGRAHARAM VILLAGE GANTDYADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P GRAMEENA VIKAS BANK, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, WARANGAL. 2. REGIONAL MANAGER, A.P. GRAMEENA VIKAS BANK VIZIANAGARAM REGION VIZIANAGRAM 3. BRANCH MANAGER, A.P. GRAMEENA VIKAS BANK ARIKATHOTA BRANCH, RAM ABHAD RAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not counting the sick leaves available to the petitioner and regularly pay the salary with increment is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the authorities to restore the bank account which is in the name of the petitioner to be operated and pay the arrears of the salary along 2 with penal interest while reimbursing the medical expenses to the petitioner and grant the medical sick leave for the petitioner and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38647 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release the salary payable to the petitioner from the month of July, 2013 forthwith along with the increments pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 100067 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. K SRINIVASA MURTHY (SC FOR HPCL) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the interim order dated 05.11.2013 passed by this Court has been complied with. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed in terms of the interim order dated 05.11.2013, leaving it open for the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if so required. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.04.2026 PNS