Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1245 (AP)

S.Venkateswarlu S/o Hanumaiah v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25155/2013 · 2026-04-05

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010720882013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25155/2013 Between: 1. S.VENKATESWARLU S/O HANUMAIAH, RETIRED RECORD ASST., C/O B.SRINIVASA BABJI, H.NO.3-33-75, 3RD LANE, N.G.O.COLONY, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AE, HYDERABAD. 4. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE S.S. & N COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, S.S. & N COLLEGE, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, DISTRICT TREASURY, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 8. THE ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICER, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to pay pension and other terminal benefits due to the writ petitioner by declaring the inaction as illegal, arbitrary and violative of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further violative of Circular Memo No.1469/62/A1/PEN/2010 dt.3.8.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent herein and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 31031 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 to 6 herein to pay anticipatory pension and anticipatory gratuity to the writ petitioner in terms of Rule 51(A) and (C) of Revised Pension Rules, 1980 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V MALLIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner and his wife have passed away and that the service benefits were settled in favour of the unmarried daughter, by name Sakila Anuradha, and has placed the relevant proceedings on record. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.04.2026 PNS