Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2012 DAILYLAW 589 (ORI)

MANORAMA ENGINEERING v. AST.PROV.FUND COMNR.

WP(C)/15009/2012 · 2026-02-13

R K Pattanaik

Writ Petition (Civil)body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.15009 of 2012 M/s. Manorama Engineering and Construction …. Petitioner Mr. K. Panigrahi, Advocate -Versus- Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (PD) SRO, Berhampur & another …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panda, ASC Mr. B.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate For O.P. No.2 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 13.02.2026 04. 1. Mr. Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter. Mr. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate appears for opposite party No.2. In view of the submission as above for having no instructions, the writ petition is disposed of and dismissed accordingly. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Balaram Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT