HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 735 of 2012 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. No one appears on behalf of the appellant even in the revised call. 2. It is informed by the Counsel for the respondent that constant illness slips are being sent by the Counsel for the appellant as is evident from the order-sheet dated 28.05.2025. 3. In view thereof, I do not see any reason to adjourn the matter further on the illness slip sent by the Counsel for the appellant. 4. In absence of Counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. The amount deposited shall be transmitted to the tribunal concerned for being paid to the claimants in accordance with law. May 12, 2026 akverma Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vibhuti Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chetan Prakash, Jitendra Kumar, Kuldeep Kuamr, Pranshu Gupta, Ratnesh Kumar Pandey, Saurabh Raj, Shachi Srivastava, Sudhir Kumar (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) United India Insurance Co. Ltd. .....Appellant(s) Sanjay Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad