HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 56722 of 2012 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. March 18, 2026 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, Jagadeesh Prasad Chaurasiya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nitin Kumar Agarwal, Nitin Kumar Agrawal (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Savitri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad