Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2012 IN WP/2757/2012 RAM BHANUDAS MAGAR VERSUS NARAYAN SANTRAM BANSODE ... Adv. Shital S. Karle, Advocate for the respondent ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 09/09/2026
ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :- . In the order under contempt, it was directed to the Head Master to forward the proposal of the petitioner including its pay scale.
2. The sole respondent has filed affidavit-in-reply wherein he has stated that the proposal was forwarded to the Education Officer , Zilla Parishad and accordingly the proposal is decided and the arrears from December, 2006 up to October, 2012 are also paid in compliance of the order.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt petition and the petition stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:42135