1 914 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2012 IN WP/11758/2010 MALLIKARJUN VISHWANATH KARBHARI VERSUS PUNDLIK RANGNATH DESHMUKH AND ANR ... Adv. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 09/09/2026 ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :- . None for the petitioner. 2. From the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent no.2 acquiring body, it appears that the order under contempt is complied with by deciding the representation under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act and further by making the payment to petitioner. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:42140