Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 2561 (BOM)

MEGHRAJ UGAMCHAND CHAUDHARI v. SHYAM V DESHPANDE AND ORS

CP/536/2012 · 2026-09-10

Contempt Petitionbody2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

536.12CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.536 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8507 OF 2011 MEGHRAJ UGAMCHAND CHAUDHARI VERSUS SHYAM V.DESHPANDE & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.A.N.Nagargoje AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil Advocate for respondent no. 3 : Mr.Ajinkya S. Deshpande h/f. Mr.Amit S. Deshpande … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.09.2026 ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1] As directed in the order under contempt, respondent no.1 – Collector had constituted the Committee of four officials and the Committee so constituted submitted it’s inquiry report to the Municipal Council, Jalna. 2] Respondent no. 3 Municipal Council has filed affidavit-in-reply stating that after receipt of the report of the Committee, the Municipal Council took necessary actions on the basis of the report and thereby removed the encroachment on 22.02.2013. 2026:BHC-AUG:42242 536.12CP 2 3] Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the report submitted by the Committee was factually incorrect. 4] Thus, in view of compliance of the order, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC