Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
87.12CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.87 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2762 OF 2011 SUNIL RAOSAHEB SATPUTE & ANOTHER VERSUS G.B.DHANORKAR ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosle ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.09.2026
ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1] In the order under contempt, it was directed to the authorities to decide representation of the petitioners as early as possible. 2] The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent, wherein it is stated that the order under contempt is complied with by deciding representation on 27.06.2024. 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:42236-DB