(1) 1 CP-184.2012.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2012 IN WP/6034/2011 BHAGWAT KASHINATH PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … None for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent-State. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. In the order under contempt, it was directed to pass the Award under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act and after passing of the Award, if the petitioner is entitled, it was directed to pay the rental compensation to him. In the order dated 06.02.2013, it was observed that the Collector has already decided the application for rental compensation and the Award under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act is also passed on 11.08.2011. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition and it stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde