(1) 7 CP-524.2012.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 524 OF 2012 IN WP/7111/2011 RAJABAI PANDOJI KSHIRSAGAR VERSUS MEGHA GADGIL, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT., MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS … None for the petitioner. Mr. R.D. Raut, A.G.P. for respondent-State. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. It seems that with the passage of time, the order under contempt must have been complied with, as in the order under contempt, it was directed to decide the representation of the petitioner for grant of “Sanman Pension”, afresh. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives in the petition and the contempt petition is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde