HANSABAI BHAURAO KHANDAGALE v. JOGINDAR KAUR PRITAMSINGH SHILEDAR AND ORS
CP/535/2012 · 2026-09-07
Contempt Petitionbody2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2541 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2541 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 9 CP-535.2012.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2012 IN WP/283/2012 HANSABAI BHAURAO KHANDAGALE VERSUS JOGINDAR KAUR PRITAMSINGH SHILEDAR AND OTHERS … Mr. J.B. Paikrao, Advocate holding for Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. , A.G.P. for respondent-State. ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) :
1. Learned advocate Mr. Paikrao holding for learned advocate Mr. Suryawanshi for the petitioner, submits that the
order under contempt was passed in Writ Petition No. 283 of 2012 and now the writ petition itself is disposed of.
2. Hence, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde