(1) 8 CP-525.2012.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 525 OF 2012 IN WP/7081/2011 PURBHAJI RAMJI TULE VERSUS MEGHA GADGIL, GENERAL ADMN. DEPT, MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS … None for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent-State. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. In the order under contempt it was directed to State Government to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of “Sanman Pension”, afresh. Accordingly, affidavit-in-reply is filed by respondent No.1, by which, it is stated that the claim of the petitioner is rejected and the same is communicated to the petitioner by letter dated 19.01.2013. 3. As the order under contempt is complied with by deciding the claim afresh, nothing survives in this contempt petition and it is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde