Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 2504 (BOM)

UTTAMCHAND CHIMNIRAM JAIN v. BANYABHAI VITTHALDAS SHAH DIED AND ORS

WP/1843/2012 · 2026-09-01

Civil Appealbody2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903 WP1843.2012+ -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO. 1843 OF 2012 UTTAMCHAND CHIMNIRAM JAIN VERSUS BANYABHAI VITTHALDAS SHAH DIED AND ORS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R. R. Sancheti Advocate for Respondents No.3B to 3D : Mr. Ajay T. Kanawade ... WITH … WRIT PETITION NO. 1850 OF 2012 DEVENDRA AMRUTLAL PADIYAR VERSUS BANYABHAI VITTHALDAS SHAH AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R. R. Sancheti Advocate for Respondents No.3B to 3D : Mr. Ajay T. Kanawade … CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 01.09.2026 PER COURT :- 1. Parties are ad idem that since the orders of status quo are in vogue from 29.02.2012 and 01.03.2012 in respective Petitions, the same be maintained till disposal of the suits. 2. Accordingly, the orders of status quo dated 29.02.2012 and 01.03.2012 shall continue to operate till disposal of the suits. 2026:BHC-AUG:39691 903 WP1843.2012+ -2- 3. Needless to state that the trial court shall make an endeavour to decide the suits expeditiously and in any case within a period of one year from today and shall not be impressed by the observations rendered by the District Judge-1, Nandurbar in Misc. Civil Appeal No.6 of 2008 and Misc. Civil Appeal No.7 of 2008. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) marathe