Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 2456 (BOM)

SHRI. RAJENDRA KHETAMAL JAIN v. SMT. MANISHA MANOHAR DALI and ORS

CRA/58/2012 · 2026-08-20

Civil Appealbody2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(905) CRA-58.12.DOCX lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.58 OF 2012 Shri. Rajendra Khetamal Jain : Applicant Versus Smt. Manisha Manohar Dali And Ors : Respondents. ______________________________________________________ None for the Applicant. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATED : 20 AUGUST 2026 PC:- 1. This Civil Revision Application is listed at Sr. No.905 on today’s Supplementary Board under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. On 17 August 2026 the following order was made :- “1. By the present Civil Revision Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) :- "a) this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the Judgment and order dated 11-02- 2011 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ratnagiri in Civil Appeal No.41 of 2010; b) this Hon'ble Court be pleased to confirm the decree passed by the IInd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ratnagiri in Regular Civil Suit No.64 of 2007 with certain modifications; c) this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises to the Applicant;" 2. On 12th June, 2026, the following order was made: 1 LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date: 2026.08.21 09:52:41 +0530 (905) CRA-58.12.DOCX "1. None for the parties. 2. Place the matter under the caption for 'Dismissal' on 10/07/2026." 3. When this application was called out, the names of the Applicant 3. as well as the Advocate-on-record (Mr. Manoj Gavankar and Mr. Arfan Sait) are called out by the Court Sheristedar, none appears. 4. In the interest of justice and to afford one more opportunity to the Applicant/Advocate for the Applicant to appears and argue the case, list this matter on 20th August, 2026, under the caption "For Dismissal". 3. When this Civil Revision Application was called out, the name of the Applicant and the names of the Advocate on record Mr. Arfan Sait, Advocate Manoj Gavankar (whose name is reflected in the order dated 05 July 2017 and order dated 17 August 2017) and Mr. Manas Gawankar (whose name is reflected in the order dated 30 October 2017 ) were called out by the Court Sheristedar. None appears for the Applicant. 4. In view of the order dated 17 August 2026 and for the absence of the Applicant and/or Advocate for the Applicant on record, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss this Civil Revision Application for non prosecution. 5. Civil Revision Application No.58 of 2012 is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) 2