Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 2450 (BOM)

SMT. TEJASHREE RAJENDRA KATHE AND ORS v. SHRI VIKAS MARCUS SAWANT AND ORS

IA/4516/2026 · 2026-06-25

Shri Jitendra Shantilal Jain

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

rsk 1 903-FA-1121-12.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1121 OF 2012 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4516 OF 2026 Smt. Tejashree Rajendra Kathe & Ors. ….Appellants Vs Shri Vikas Marcus Sawant & Ors. .…Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Mr. Sachin Gite for the Appellants/Applicants. Mr. Sarthak Diwan for the Respondent No.3. _____________________________________________________________ CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J. DATED : 25 JUNE 2026 P. C. : INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4516 OF 2026 1. Delay if any is condoned. This application is filed for deletion of Appellant No.5. For the reasons stated in the application deletion is permitted. Amendment to be carried out and reverification is dispensed with. FIRST APPEAL NO.1121 OF 2012 2. This appeal was admitted on 5 September 2012. The parties have settled the matter between them and have tendered consent terms which are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 3. The appellants are present in the Court. The officer of Respondent No.3 is also present in the Court. Signatures of the parties have been identified by their respective advocates. rsk 2 903-FA-1121-12.doc 4. The parties have in the Court stated that they have understood the contents of the Consent Terms and same has been explained to them by their respective advocates in the language which is known to them. The parties have stated that Consent Terms have been signed without any duress. 5. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms which are taken on record. Undertakings given in the Consent Terms are to be treated as undertaking given to the Court. 6. Appeal is disposed of. [ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]