Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 2426 (BOM)

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. RENUKA MANOJ CHAVAN AND ANR

FA/31/2012 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalat

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 FA 31-2012.odt BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD AT HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Organized by High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad under section 19, of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act) Appellant : Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Through Divisional Controller Respondents : Renuka Wd/o Manoj Chavan and others No. of proceeding : FIRST APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2012 Advocate for the Appellant : Smt. R. D. Reddy Name of Hon’ble High Court Judge : Smt. Vaishali Patil - Jadhav Retired Judicial Officer : Shri. S. G. Shete Name of Member : Adv. Avinash R. Borulkar AWARD Not on board. On being mentioned, taken on board. 1. The learned advocate for the appellant alongwith the Law Officer of appellant – Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Mr. Avinash Satwaji Vishwas are present alongwith the authority letter and withdrawal pursis which are marked as “X” and “X-1”. 2. In view of the withdrawal pursis, first Appeal is disposed of. Pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of. 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:13439 2 FA 31-2012.odt 3. In view of the withdrawal of the appeal, the amount which is deposited in this Court is permitted to be withdrawn by the claimants as per the apportionment made by the M.A.C.T., Aurangabad in M.A.C.P. No. 9/2010. 4. The learned advocate for the appellant undertakes to communicate this order to the respondents/claimants or learned counsel for the respondents in writing. 5. The parties are informed that the Court fee, if any, paid by any of them, shall be refunded. (Avinash R. BORULKAR) (S. G. SHETE) (VAISHALI PATIL -JADHAV, J.) Advocate D.J. (Retd.) Head of Panel Member Member Date: 14.03.2026 (Seal of the Authority/Committee) P.S.B. 2 of 2