VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. FAKIRA SONAJI SHEJODE (DEAD), THR. L.RS. ANIL FAKIRA SHEJODE AND 3 OTHERS
FA/540/2012 · 2026-06-17
Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar
body2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2419 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2419 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2 357.fa540.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 540 OF 2012 VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. FAKIRA SONAJI SHEJODE (DEAD), THR. L.RS. AND 3 OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 852 OF 2012 VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. SAMADHAN GOVINDA WAYAL AND OTHERS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders
Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vinay Dahat, Advocate h/f Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for appellant. Mr. H.D. Dubey, AGP for respondent/State. Mr. N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for respondent No.1A & 1B.
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 17.06.2026
These appeals are filed by the appellant – VIDC, Chikhali, thereby challenging the judgment dated 07.08.2010 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Buldhana.
2. At the outset, Mr. Dahat, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the matters are covered by virtue of the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and corrigendum dated 13.08.2018, whereby it has been directed not to prefer an appeal if the enhanced rate is less than four times the rate awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Prity
2 / 2 357.fa540.2012
3. Statement is accepted.
4. In view of the aforesaid Government Resolution and corrigendum, the appeals stand disposed of.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J] Prity