931 RA 185-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 185 OF 2012 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2011 NEMULAL MARUTI BHANDWALE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Y.B. Pathan – Advocate for Respondent No.1 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATE : 21st August, 2024 PER COURT : 1. None present for the applicants. 2. The record shows that, the matter was kept for dismissal on 29.07.2024 vide order dated 19.07.2024, as despite two last chances the learned Counsel for the applicants failed to work out the matter. Thereafter on 29.07.2024 the matter was again fixed for final hearing by way of last chance on 07.08.2024 by imposing cost Rs.3,000/-. The office note shows that, the applicants have deposited the cost. However, on 07.08.2024 again the matter was adjourned by way of last chance. 3. Today the learned Counsel for the applicants remained absent. Pooja K. 1/2 2024:BHC-AUG:18892 931 RA 185-2012 Therefore it appears the applicants are not interested in proceeding with the matter. As such, the application dismissed for default. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K. 2/2