weekly rest has been wrongly rejected, vide impugned order dated 28.06.2012, whereas granted to similarly situated employees, details of which he shall provide by making a fresh representation, whic directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel submits that weekly rest has been wrongly rejected, vide impugned order dated 28.06.2012, whereas granted to similarly situated employees, details of which he shall provide by making a fresh representation, whic directed to be decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel submits that the claim of wages regarding weekly rest has been wrongly rejected, vide impugned order dated 28.06.2012, whereas granted to similarly situated employees, details of which he shall provide by making a fresh representation, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.