IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 872 CWP-8552-2012 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 ANITA ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal and Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing of order dated 05.01.2012, Annexure P-6 might not be surviving due to efflux of time. 2. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the referred rules are not applicable to the petitioner as she was on deputation and not absorbed. Even as per rules, for the employee of Zamidara Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Society, Charkhi Dadri-respondent No.4, namely the Service Rules for Primary Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Societies Working in the State of Haryana at Mandi Level do not provide for the relief sought for. 3. Learned arguing counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to establish contact with his client. 4. Disposed of accordingly, however, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 27, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.28 17:00 I am the author of this document