PRITAM KAUR v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS
CWP/20618/2012 · 2026-07-27
Aman Chaudhary
body2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2078 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2078 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 896
CWP-20618-2012 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026
PRITAM KAUR ... Petitioner VERSUS UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 01.12.2010, Annexure P-8, vide which less service has been taken into
consideration for releasing the retiral benefits and family pension etc. might not be surviving due to efflux of time especially in wake of there being no interim order.
2.
Disposed of accordingly, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 27, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.27 18:53 I am the author of this document