KARAN SINGH v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM ETC.
CWP/295/2012 · 2026-07-24
Aman Chaudhary
body2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 2065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 849
CWP-295-2012 Date of Decision: 24.07.2026
KARAN SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM ETC. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: None. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the orders dated 11.06.1993 as also 09.07.1993, Annexure P-1 (colly.) might not be surviving due to efflux of time especially in wake of there being no interim order.
2.
Disposed of accordingly, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 24, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.24 16:35 I am the author of this document