IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 815 LEELAWANTI STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Shashi Chopra Vs. State of Haryana and others index of the petition, to be pending at that time, was disposed of vide judgment dated 3.7.2012, which stands implemented during pendency of COCP-1328 consideration of the matter in light 2. of hearing, learned State counsel fairly states that the Authority would not be averse to having a relook at the matter. 3. petition is disposed of directing respondents for consideration, keeping in mind the submissions recorded hereinabove and judgment referred and decide the same in accordance with law, within 6 months, after affording a proper opportunity of hearing to her, which this Court has no reason to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision LEELAWANTI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. G.S.Bal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned Senior Counsel submits that CWP Shashi Chopra Vs. State of Haryana and others index of the petition, to be pending at that time, was disposed of vide judgment dated 3.7.2012, which stands implemented during pendency of 1328-2013, decided on 14.01.2014. consideration of the matter in light thereof, in a time bound manner. The above facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel fairly states that the Authority would not be averse to having a relook at the matter. In view of the candid stand taken petition is disposed of directing respondents for consideration, keeping in mind the submissions recorded hereinabove and judgment referred and decide the same in accordance with law, within 6 months, after affording pportunity of hearing to her, which this Court has no reason to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15573-2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 23.07.2026 LEELAWANTI ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY with Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. Learned Senior Counsel submits that CWP-6692-2010, Shashi Chopra Vs. State of Haryana and others, relied upon in the index of the petition, to be pending at that time, was disposed of vide judgment dated 3.7.2012, which stands implemented during pendency of , decided on 14.01.2014. He, thus, prays for thereof, in a time bound manner. The above facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel fairly states that the Authority would not In view of the candid stand taken on either side, the present petition is disposed of directing respondents for consideration, keeping in mind the submissions recorded hereinabove and judgment referred and decide the same in accordance with law, within 6 months, after affording pportunity of hearing to her, which this Court has no reason to PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.23 19:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-15573-2011 -2- believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 23.07.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.23 19:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.