218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9864-2012 Decided on : July 09, 2026 TEK CHAND . . . Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. No written request for adjournment has also been received on his behalf. 2. On the previous dates of hearing i.e. 11.11.2025 and 25.02.2026 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 5. Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) July 09, 2026 JUDGE Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.10 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh