IN TH 213 Vijay Pal a Satpal and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU against the the suit file of permane 2012 and issued vid repeatedly appearance appellants s had since b RSA-1476-2012 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.14 Date of decision :-25.02.202 y Pal and another Versus al and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. Service upon respondents No.1 (vide order dated 19.3.2015). None for respondent No.3. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The plaintiffs/appellants have st the concurrent findings of the lear uit filed by the plaintiffs for declarati rmanent injunction has been dismissed The record reveals that the m and is still at the stage of argumen d vide order dated 02.04.2013. atedly been adjourned either at the arance of learned counsel for the appel On 20.09.2024, learned co llants submitted that the earlier counse since been elevated to the Bench of th 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.1476 of 2012 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ts No.1 and 2 dispensed with 015). ve filed the present appeal e learned Courts below whereby claration and consequential relief missed by both the Courts below. t the matter pertains to the year rguments. Notice of motion was 013. Thereafter, the case has at the request or due to non- appellants. ed counsel appearing for the counsel engaged by the appellants of this Court and sought time to VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document obtain fres completing hearing, no dispensed w office repo respondent appellants the present time of the appellant in have adopt neither the pursuing th option exce February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-1476-2012 (O & M) n fresh instructions. Again, on 11.08. leting instructions. Today, when the ng, none has put in appearance on beh Service upon respondents N nsed with vide order dated 19.03.201 e report dated 10.12.2024, none ha ndent No.3 either. A bare reading of the abo s have exhibited an utterly casua resent litigation. It is to be appreciate of the Court has been expended in aff llant in the interest of justice. On the adopted an utterly casual and careles er the appellants nor their counsel ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, uary 25, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 11.08.2025, time was sought for n the matter has been called for on behalf of the appellants. ents No.1 and 2 was already .03.2015. Despite service, as per ne has appeared on behalf of e above facts shows that the casual attitude in the pursuit of reciated that very valuable public in affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the appellants areless approach. It is clear that unsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document