Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1948 (PNJ)

SOHAN SINGH v. MOHAN SINGH & ORS

RSA/4024/2012 · 2026-04-22

Pankaj Jain

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-4024-2012 (O&M) 1 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-5357-C-2026 in CM-1918-C-2026 in RSA-4024-2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2026 SOHAN SINGH ....Appellant Versus MOHAN SINGH & ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. S.S. Panag, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Sukhdev Singh Kanwal, Advocate for respondent No.1(v) and (vi). PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) CM-5357-C-2026 This is an application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 r/w Section 151 CPC for placing on record compromise deed, dated 16.04.2026 (Annexure A-1). Further prayer is for disposal of the appeal in terms of the compromise/settlement. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed. Compromise deed, marked as Annexure A-1 is taken on record. CM-1918-C-2026 This an application filed under Order XLI Rule 19 r/w Section 151 CPC seeking restoration of the main appeal. DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.04.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-4024-2012 (O&M) 2 Notice of the application. Mr. Kanwal accepts notice and pleads no objection. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number and taken on Board today itself. CM-9814-C-2012 By way of present application filed under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC, applicant/appellant seeks impleadment of LRs of deceased/respondent No.1 Mohan Singh, who is stated to have died during the pendency of the appeal. As per the averments made in the application, there is no other surviving legal heir left by deceased/respondent No.1 Mohan Singh, except those mentioned in Para No.3 of the application. Death certificate of the deceased/respondent No.1 has been placed on record as Annexure A-1. Application is supported by affidavit. In view of above, the instant application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Legal heirs of the deceased/respondent No.1 as detailed out in Para No.3 of the application, are ordered to be impleaded. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. RSA-4024-2012 (O&M) Counsel for the appellant submits that as per Annexure A-1, the parties have settled their dispute amicably 2. Counsel for respondent No.1(v) and (vi) agrees to the factum of their being a compromise between the parties. 3. One of the terms of the settlement reads as under: DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.04.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-4024-2012 (O&M) 3 “3. This settlement would supersede all other instruments, mutations, decrees etc. relating to above property.” 4. In view of above, the appeal is disposed off in terms of the settlement. 5. Decree be drawn. 6. Settlement be made part of the decree. 7. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed off. April 22, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.04.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document