686 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1612-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 Birbal Singh ......Appellant Vs. Haryana Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. J.P.Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Varun Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has expired and he is not in contact with the legal representative(s) of the appellant, as such, he is unable to pursue the present appeal. He, therefore, prays that the present appeal be dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the appellant to seek revival of the same. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the appellant to move an appropriate application for revival of the present appeal, in accordance with law, if any cause of action survives. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 18.03.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.19 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document