CRM-M-6778 IN TH SUMIT STATE OF H Coram: Hon’ Argued by: SHALINI SIN 1. dated 26.03.20 Penal Code, S 2012, Police 307/308/506/2 deleted from regular bail. 2. daughters who old, told her tw her for the las with knife, to 1 67781-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Versus OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Shalini Singh Ms. Pooja Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, DAG Hary None for respondent No. 2. *** NI SINGH NAGPAL J. Petitioner seeks regular bail in c .03.2024 under Sections 148, 149, 506 ode, Sections 6 Protection of Childre olice Station Sanoli, District Panip /506/201/376(2)(n) IPC were added an from the FIR during investigation. Mother of the prosecutrix state rs who were all minors. Her elder dau her two months ago that Sumit son o the last 02 years since she was 14½ ife, took her to the fields, raped her UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH Reserved on: 29.01.2026 Pronounced on: 31.01.2026 Uploaded on: 31.01.2026 …Petitioner ER …Respondents Singh Nagpal Haryana. il in case arising out of FIR No. 73 49, 506, 323, 335, 452, 354-A Indian hildren from Sexual Offences Act, Panipat. Offences under Sections ded and Sections 325, 323 IPC were tion. This is the first petition for stated that she had a son and 4 der daughter ‘K’, who was 17 years t son of Amarpal has been harassing 14½ of age; that he threatened her her forcefully and made obscene 2026 2026 2026 o. 73 dian Act, tions were for nd 4 years ssing her cene SUMIT SINGLA 2026.01.31 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-6778 photos and vid viral, if she d several times far away. She accused with t they would p Thereafter, she Sumit started harassing ‘K’. back to the vil about 7.00 PM Gulal to ‘K’. members of h house, Mohit her daughter ‘ Kanwar Pal. A on forehead an iron rods. The his family mem 3. time of alleged Section 6 POC examination, petitioner. In relationship an 2 67781-2025 (O&M) nd videos, threatening to kill her and she disclosed the incident to anyone times. Two months ago, ‘K’ started we y. She informed her husband and th with their family members. Family m ould prevail over him and that Su ter, she sent ‘K’ to her brother’s hous tarted roaming in front of her broth g ‘K’. When ‘K’ informed her, she a the village and he did accordingly. The .00 PM, Sumit came to their house sa ‘K’. They sent him back but Sum s of his family, armed with sharp e ohit and other family members and ghter ‘K’, brother Mohit, brother-in Pal. Amit and Deepak were armed w ead and head, one after the other. Othe s. They were facing threat to life and ly members and were living in the shad Learned counsel for the petition alleged occurrence was more than 17 6 POCSO Act in the case even when tion, that neither any injury nor any r. In fact, petitioner and the prose hip and FIR was registered when fam er and to make her obscene videos nyone In this manner, he raped her ted weeping and told her to send her and they went to the house of the mily members of Sumit assured that at Sumit would not trouble ‘K’. ’s house in Panipat. After few days, brother’s house and again started she asked her husband to bring her ly. The day before, on 25.03.2024, at use saying that he wanted to apply t Sumit, in consultation with other harp edged weapons, attacked their s and caused serious injuries to her, in-law’s son Aman and husband med with Gandasis. They hit Mohit r. Others were armed with sticks and e and property from the accused and he shadow of fear and terror. etitioner submits prosecutrix at the an 17 years old; that police invoked hen prosecutrix refused for medical r any weapon was attributed to the prosecutrix were in a consensual en family of the prosecutrix came to ideos her d her f the that ‘K’. days, arted g her 4, at pply other their her, band ohit s and and the oked dical o the nsual e to SUMIT SINGLA 2026.01.31 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-6778 know of the re Petitioner, who to be enlarged 4. of Harshit Go with custody ground that d 164 Cr.PC., t petitioner did commission of the case. On a 325, 308 IPC Material witne did not deserve 5. served but non 6. than 01 year 0 involved in an during the tria prospect of the there is no re justice. Consid commenting o 3 67781-2025 (O&M) the relationship. A quarrel occurred a er, who was behind bars for the last 0 larged on regular bail. Learned State counsel has filed st hit Goel, IPS, Assistant Superintende stody certificate and opposed the pr that during investigation, in her state .PC., the victim girl fully supporte r did not get recovered mobile phon sion of crime, on account of which Se . On account of the grievous injuries 8 IPC were invoked. Out of total 29 P l witnesses had all supported prosecu eserve to be enlarged on regular bail. Notice issued to respondent No ut none has put in appearance on her b Concededly, petitioner is in judi year 08 months. His antecedents are c in any other offence. 05 PWs out of he trial, including the victim and co t of the petitioner influencing them. Pe no reason to believe that he would Considering the facts and circumsta ting on merits, petition is allowed. Pe rred and both sides suffered injuries. last 01 year and 08 months, deserved filed status report by way of affidavit ntendent of Police, Samalkha along the prayer for regular bail on the statement recorded under Section pported the prosecution case. The phone used by him at the time of ich Section 201 IPC was invoked in njuries suffered by Mohit, Sections al 29 PWs, only 05 were examined. rosecution case. As such, petitioner r bail. ent No. 2 has been received back n her behalf to contest the petition. n judicial custody for the last more s are clean and he is not stated to be out of total 29 have been examined nd complainant. There is, thus, no em. Petitioner has a fixed abode and would evade the trial or flee from umstances of the case but without ed. Petitioner-Sumit is ordered to be ries. rved davit long the ction The e of ed in tions ined. ioner back more to be ined s, no and from thout to be SUMIT SINGLA 2026.01.31 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-6778 released on reg the Chief Judic 7. Reserved on: Pronounced o Ajay Goswami 4 67781-2025 (O&M) on regular bail on his furnishing requi f Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/ Pending CRM(s), if any, are also d on: 29.01.2026 nced on: 31.01.2026 Whether speaking/reaso Whether reportable g requisite bail bonds/surety bonds to istrate/trial Court concerned. e also disposed of accordingly. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE easoned Yes/No Yes/No ds to AL) SUMIT SINGLA 2026.01.31 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document