Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1911 (PNJ)

SATISH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/22469/2023 · 2026-01-13

Deepinder Singh Nalwa

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

            !"#$%&#'()($*+ , ,               +  -.,// .           !"  ##### /.0, 1!2 $ %  is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner in the pay scale of the Lecturer w.e.f. 16.05.2012 i.e. the date from which the petitioner was given the deemed date of promotion as a Lecturer. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a perusal of the written statement filed by the respondents would show that as per the respondents, the case of the petitioner will be considered after the finalization of the seniority list of Master Cadre in terms of the judgment dated 15.02.2023 passed by this Court in CWP No.28434 of 2019 titled as Harbhajan Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, and as such, the claim of the petitioner cannot be decided at this stage. -1- DIWAKER GULATI 2026.01.14 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final seniority list of Master Cadre has been issued now by the respondents. He, on instructions from the petitioner, further submits that he will be satisfied, at this stage, if a direction is given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for fixation of pay of the Lecturer taking into consideration the final seniority list. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. $%%         %              &     %%' % ()            6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of.  , ,  /.   * +'  , - *   , - -2- DIWAKER GULATI 2026.01.14 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document