Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1908 (PNJ)

RAJEEV KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/6501/2026 · 2026-04-21

Jagmohan Bansal

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 122 Rajeev Kumar State of Haryana CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryana (assisted by Mr. Satish Singla, State Registrar). JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J 1. The the Constitution of India is seeking direction to Registrar (Firms & Societies), Haryana manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed an appeal under Section 79 of the Haryana Regulation and Registration of Societies Act, 2012, which is pending for last one year with the State Registrar (Firms & Societies), Haryana. 3. Learned State counsel submits th petitioner’s appeal would be adjudicated within 6 weeks from today. 4. In the wake of the statement of learned State counsel, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not seek unnecessary adjournments and 21.04.2026 Vimal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Rajeev Kumar Versus State of Haryana & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Lalit Pardhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryana (assisted by Mr. Satish Singla, State Registrar). JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 the Constitution of India is seeking direction to Registrar (Firms & Societies), Haryana to decide Learned counsel for the petitioner filed an appeal under Section 79 of the Haryana Regulation and Registration of Societies Act, 2012, which is pending for last one year with the State Registrar (Firms & Societies), Haryana. Learned State counsel submits th petitioner’s appeal would be adjudicated within 6 weeks from today. In the wake of the statement of learned State counsel, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not seek adjournments and fully cooperate with the Appellate Authority. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6501-2026 Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Lalit Pardhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryana (assisted by Mr. Satish Singla, State Registrar). petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.2-State to decide his appeal in a time bound Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an appeal under Section 79 of the Haryana Regulation and Registration of Societies Act, 2012, which is pending for last one year with the State Registrar Learned State counsel submits that as per his instructions, petitioner’s appeal would be adjudicated within 6 weeks from today. In the wake of the statement of learned State counsel, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not seek cooperate with the Appellate Authority. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of State appeal in a time bound submits that the petitioner has filed an appeal under Section 79 of the Haryana Regulation and Registration of Societies Act, 2012, which is pending for last one year with the State Registrar at as per his instructions, In the wake of the statement of learned State counsel, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not seek VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.21 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document