IN T 213 Parduman Rameshwa CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU against the learned firs 30.04.2012 Rajpura in declaration today. respondent predecease learned cou legal repres RSA-2254-2015 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.2254 Date of decision :-27.03.2026 uman Kumar Versus shwar Dass and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant. Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for I GUPTA J. (Oral) The plaintiff has preferred t st the judgment and decree dated ed first Appellate Court, whereby the 4.2012 passed by the learned Civil ura in a suit filed by the plaintiff ration and permanent injunction, has b None has put in appearance Learned counsel for respon ndent No.1 has expired issueless eceased him; thus, he is not survived b A perusal of the order sheets ed counsel for the appellant sought t representatives of the deceased appel 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH o.2254 of 2015 (O & M) …..Appellant …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for respondent No.1. rred the present second appeal dated 03.01.2015 passed by the by the judgment and decree dated Civil Judge (Junior Division), aintiff for specific performance, , has been set aside. rance on behalf of the appellant respondent No.1 submits that ueless and that his wife had ived by any legal representative. heets reveals that on 31.01.2025, ught time to bring on record the appellant as well as of deceased VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent learned cou the sole ap No.1 had Despite thi move an a representat appellant. proceeding impleading respondent the parties inaction on for substitu to the prol years, the l in pursuing engaged co the presen representat revival of t advised. RSA-2254-2015 (O & M) ndent No.2. Thereafter, on 07.07.2 ed counsel for the appellant that even ole appellant had expired, and learn had also submitted that both the this, further time was sought on e an appropriate application for brin sentatives of the deceased legal repre llant. However, as per the office eedings, no such application has eading the legal representatives of th ndents. In the aforesaid circumstances arties would be a futile exercise. Th ion on the part of the appellant’s side ubstitution, despite repeated opportun e prolonged pendency of the presen , the legal representative(s) of the part rsuing the matter, as no effort has been ged counsel or to engage another coun Be that as it may, in view of th present appeal is disposed of, w sentative(s) of the parties to move an al of the appeal within a period of tw 2 7.07.2025, it was informed by t even the legal representatives of learned counsel for respondent h the respondents had expired. ht on behalf of the appellant to or bringing on record the legal l representatives of the deceased office report and the record of has been filed till date for s of the deceased appellant and tances, issuance of fresh notice to se. The record reflects complete t’s side in taking necessary steps portunities. It appears that owing present appeal for more than 11 he parties are no longer interested as been made either to contact the r counsel. w of the foregoing circumstances, of, with liberty to the legal ve an appropriate application for of two months from today, if so VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document addresses m March 27, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep RSA-2254-2015 (O & M) A copy of this order be se esses mentioned in the Memo of Partie Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 be sent to the parties on the Parties. if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document