Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1771 (JHR)

LODO HEMBRAM ALIAS KALESHWAR HEMBRAM v. REVENUE DEPARTMENT

WPC/5556/2012 · 2026-09-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5556 of 2012 1. Lodo Hembram @ Kaleshwar Hembram, son of late Sanatan Hembram, 2. Deblal Hembram, son of late Sanatan Hembram 3. Munshi Hembram, son of late Nunulal Hembram 4. Sawan Baski, 5. Pichu Baski 6. Hopna Baski Nos. 4, 5 and 6 all sons of late Bajur Baski 7. Uchit Murmu, son of late Hanolal Murmu 8. Nunu Lal Murmu, son of late Jiten Murmu, All residents of village-Tambajore, P.S. Nala (Bindapathar), P.O. and District-Jamtara ....... … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Revenue Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi 3. Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. and District-Jamtara 4. Subdivisional Officer, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. and District-Jamtara 5. Additional Collector, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. and District-Jamtara 6. Circle Officer, Nala, P.O. and P.S. Nala, District-Jamtara. 7. Principal, Jawahar Navoday Vidyalaya, P.O. P.S. and District-Jamtara .…. … Respondents -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Manish Singh, A.C. to Kaushik Sarkhel For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Shahi, Advocate 10/ 08.09.2026: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 18.01.2012 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara, (Respondent No. 3), whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order of learned S.D.O., Jamtara in Revenue Miscellaneous Case No. 372/2005-06 dated 04.05.2006, has been dismissed affirming the order of learned S.D.M. by which the S.D.O. has cancelled the pattas of the jamabandi raiyats. 2. Mr. Manish Singh, learned counsel on instruction of Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel who is advocate on record, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 3. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Shahi, learned counsel for the respondent-State has got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Dt.08.09.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-