Krishna Bahadur Chhetri v. The Union Of India and Ors
MJC/3383/2012 · 2026-06-18
Rajiv Roy
body2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 1764 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 1764 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3383 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2221 of 2005 ====================================================== Krishna Bahadur Chhetri S/O Lak Bahadur Chhetri Proprietor Of M/S Dahai Agro Products, Resident Of Village Dhumpara, P.O. Nathus Hat, P.S. Banarhai, District Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The Union Of India
2. The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance Department Of Revenue, Union Of India, New Delhi, Namely Sri R.S S/O Not Known
3. Central Board Of Central Excise And Customs Through Its Chairman, New Delhi, Namely Sri Satish Kuma S/O Not Known
4. The Commissioner Of Customs, Patna, Namely Sri Ajay Dixit S/O Not Known
5. The Deputy Commissioner Of Customs P Farbesganj, Namely Sri Jyoti Acharya S/O Not Known
6. The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs, Farbesganj, Namely Sri Jyoti Acharya S/O Not Known ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 7 18-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
“ that this is an application for initiation of Contempt of Court proceedings against opposite parties for deliberate and willful violation of the order dated 25.01.2011 passed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.
Patna High Court MJC No.3383 of 2012(7) dt.18-06-2026 2/2 2221 of 2005 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S N Hussain whereby and whereunder the opposite parties were directed to pay Rs. 14,63,684/- within four months along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of seizure upto the date of payment of entire amount.
3. Mr. Shubham Prakash, Advocate on instruction from Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Ravi/Shivangi (Rajiv Roy, J) U