Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1376 (GAU)

SAHAJAMAL v. THE RELIANCE TELECOM LTD.

RSA/210/2012 · 2026-02-24

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010122542012 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/210/2012 SAHAJAMAL S/O LATE ABDUS SUBHAN, VILL. MISSION ROAD, BADARPUR, P.O. and P.S. BADARPUR, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM. VERSUS THE RELIANCE TELECOM LTD. HEAD OFFICE AT MUMBAI, 3RD FLOOR, MAKER CHAMBER NO. IV, 222 NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 2:THE RELIANCE TELECOM LTD. CIRCLE OFFICE AT GODREJ BUILDING ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7 3:THE MANAGER B.S.S. RELIANCE TELECOM LTD. DR. N.N. BARMAN'S BUILDING S. C. GOSWAMI ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 4:AHMED IFTIKAR ALAM CHOUDHURY 5:AHMED MUSTAFA ALAM CHOUDHURY BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE ABDUL HANNAN CHOUDHURY Page No.# 2/2 VILL. DIGHIRPAR P.O. and P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H HOQUE, MR.S DEY,MR.WISE IMRAN,MR.A B CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , ,, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 25.02.2026 None appears for the appellant on call. It appears from the order sheet that on the previous two dates as well the none had appeared for the appellant and it has been recorded that in the event of none appearance on the next date, appropriate order shall follow. Therefore, the only appropriate order i.e. is dismissal of the appeal for non- prosecution. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant