Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010004802012
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./190/2012 SYED ABUL FARUKH SON OF LATE SYED RASID AHMED R/O KABAR STHAN ROAD, P.O. and P.S.
JORHAT DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS SYEDA NASIMA YESMIN W/O SYED ABUL FARUK D/O SYED ANWAR HUSSAIN R/O CHALIHA NAGAR P.O. , P.S. and DIST. TINSUKIA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.E AHMED, MR.D R GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MISS M BARUAH, MRK KALITA,MR.P BORA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER 08.04.2026
None appears for the petitioner on call. However, Ms. K. Sharma,
learned counsel for the respondent is present. I find from the record that on the last two dates as well i.e.
Page No.# 2/2 26/3/2026 and 10/6/2025 also none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent submits that this petition has perhaps become infructuous as both the parties have amicably settled the matter and the petitioner has paid a lump sum maintenance to the respondent who has accepted the same. It is submitted by the learned counsel, Ms. Sharma that she has definite instructions regarding the same and the matter can be disposed of upon settlement. In view of the same, accepting the said prayer of the respondent side, the revision is disposed of as having become infructuous and upon settlement between the parties.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant