Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1356 (AP)

Shaik Chan Valli v. M. Janaki Ramaiah,

AS/619/2012 · 2026-08-05

Alapati Giridhar, D Ramesh

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010487722012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2012 Between: 1. Shaik Chan Valli, S/o. Shaik Abdul Rasool, R/o. D.No. 20/528, Palem Papaiah Street, Kadap City., YSR District. 1. M Janaki Ramaiah, S/o. Meruva Vasudevaiah, R/o.Upparapalle Village, Madhavaram Post, Sidhput Mandal, YSR District. 2. Smt Janapati Venkatamma, W/o. Janapati Chinna Yanadaiah, R/o. Boyanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR District IA NO: 1 OF 2012(ASMP 1702 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an injunction restraining respondents herein from creating the third party rights over the suit schedule property OS No. 56 of 2007 Family Court-Cum-VI Addl. Judge, Kadapa and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 835 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2012 Chan Valli, S/o. Shaik Abdul Rasool, R/o. D.No. 20/528, Palem Papaiah Street, Kadap City., YSR District. ...Petitioner AND 1. M Janaki Ramaiah, S/o. Meruva Vasudevaiah, R/o.Upparapalle Village, Madhavaram Post, Sidhput Mandal, YSR District. i Venkatamma, W/o. Janapati Chinna Yanadaiah, R/o. Boyanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR District ...Respondents IA NO: 1 OF 2012(ASMP 1702 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an injunction restraining respondents herein from creating the third party rights over the suit schedule property OS No. 56 of 2007 on the file of Judge VI Addl. Judge, Kadapa and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 835 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Chan Valli, S/o. Shaik Abdul Rasool, R/o. D.No. 20/528, Palem ...Petitioner 1. M Janaki Ramaiah, S/o. Meruva Vasudevaiah, R/o.Upparapalle Village, i Venkatamma, W/o. Janapati Chinna Yanadaiah, R/o. ...Respondents that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an injunction restraining respondents herein from creating the third party on the file of Judge Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take up the appeal for hearing on OUT OF TURN basis IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 715 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order of dismissal for default dt. 26/02/2015 made in AS.No. 619 of 2012 and restore the AS.No. 619 of 2012 to its file IA NO: 2 OF 2015(ASMP 2530 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased take up the above appeal for hearing on Out of Turn Basis Counsel for the Petitioner: V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondents: 6480/V HIMABINDU Counsel for the Respondents:KARRI MURALI KRISHNA The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2012 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The present Appeal Suit has been preferred challenging the order and decree dated 25.4.2012 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court - cum - VI Additional District Judge, Y.S.R. District, in O.S. No. 56 of 2007. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, despite his best efforts, he was unable to obtain instructions from the appellant to prosecute the appeal. 3. Recording the same, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed. ____________ D.RAMESH, J ____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J Dated : 06.8.2026 TJN 78 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2012 Dated: 06.8.2026 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2012 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 06.8.2026 DR, J & AGD, J The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Vide Separate Judgment) _______ DR, J _______ AGD, J TJN