Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2012 DAILYLAW 1349 (AP)

Shahnaz Begum v. The Superintending Engineer,

WP/11586/2012 · 2026-06-18

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2012

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010243962012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11586/2012 Between: 1. SHAHNAZ BEGUM, W/O NASYAM SHAIK ZAKRIYA BASHA, R/O PREMISES BEARING D.NO.10/3, 4, 5, CHINNAMOKKAPALLI ROAD, RAYACHOTI TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APSPDCL,. KADAPA 2. THE ASSITANT ENGINEER, APSPDCL,. RAYACHOTY KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in disconnecting the power supply to SC No.043570 in premises bearing D.No.10/3, 4, 5 of Chinnamokkapalli Road, Rayachoti Town, Kadapa District belonging to the Petitioner for non payment of arrears of electricity bill to the earlier SC No.6313 of the Vendor of the Petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and direct the respondents not to interfere with the Service Connection of the Petitioner for the default committed by third parties IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 14589 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents hereinto restore Power Supply to SC No.043570 2 forthwith in premises bearing D.No.10/3, 4, 5 of Chinnamokkapalli Road, Rayachoti Town, Kadapa District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 210517 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. P VINOD KUMAR 3. JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR APSPDCL 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent submits that after payment of arrears of electricity bill, the respondent authorities had restored the power supply to SC No.043570 (earlier SC No.6313) belongs to the Writ Petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner confirm this position and further submits that no further orders are required in this case. 3. Having recorded the above submissions, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 19.06.2026 MNR 4 267 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.11586 OF 2012 Dt: 19.06.2026 Mnr