APHC010457172012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36728/2012 Between: 1. KOPOLLU VENKAT SESHAIAH, S/O. LATE SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5-100/2, CHANDA NAGAR, HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AREA, HYDERABAD DISTRICT, HYDERABAD - 50 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS ZONAL COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE THASILDHAR, CHINAGADHILI MANDAL, CHINAGADHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declare the action of the Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession of the property of Petitioner to an extent of 261.33 Sq.Yards Western side of Plot No.292 in Survey No.7/1, Dharapalem Village, Mudsarlova outskirts, Visakhapatnam Rural, Madhura Vada Sub- Division, Visakhapatnam District and thereby trying to trespass, dispossess is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India 2 and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in the above lands of the Petitioners except otherwise in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 46621 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere and dispossess the Petitioners from their respective properties to an extent of 261.33 Sq.Yards Western side of Plot No.292 in Survey No.7/1, Dharapalem Village, Mudsariova outskirts, Visakhapatnam Rural, Madhura Vada Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam District except, otherwise in accordance with law, pending disposal of above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MADHAVA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. This Court, vide interim order dated 28.11.2012, directed the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in question belonging to the petitioner so long as the petitioner do not undertake any developmental activities therein, including any construction, without securing necessary approvals from the concerned authorities. 3. No counters have been filed though the writ petition is of the year 2012. 4. On these considerations, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order granted earlier by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 16.06.2026 PNS