Sri Prapathi Anjaneya Swamy Temple, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10531/2012 · 2026-06-16
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2012
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 1342 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2012 DAILYLAW 1342 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010430662012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.10531 of 2012 Between:
1. SRI PRAPATHI ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE,, REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE, VELTHURUMALLI VENKATESWARA RAO, VILLATURU VILLAGE, G. KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521229.
2. VELTHURUMALLI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. NAGENDRA RAO, TRUSTEE OF SRI PRAPATHI ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, VILLATURU VILLAGE, G. KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521229.
3. K. RAMAKRISHNA CHARYULU,, S/O. VENKATARAMA CHARYULU, HEREDITARY ARCHAKA, SRI PRAPATHI ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, VILLATURU VILLAGE, G.
KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521229.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS-I) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. SRI RUKMINI SATYABHAMA SAMETHA SRI VENUGOPALA, SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VELLATURU VILLAGE, G. KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 229.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly
2 one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the installation of Dwaja Sthambham in the petitioner No.1 temple premises i.e. Sri Praparthi Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Vellaturu Village, G.Konduru Mandal of Krishna District, declaring their action as illegal, and ultra wires to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V S R ANJANEYALU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V T M PRASAD
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.10531 of 2012
ORDER:-
Learned Senior Counsel Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, assisted by Ms.S.Sai Sneha, learned counsel, stated that the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time and the same is endorsed on the bundle by the assisted counsel.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.06.2026
siva
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Writ Petition No.10531 of 2012
17.06.2026
ssiivvaa