APHC010313782012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39140/2012 Between: 1. T.K.N.RICE INDUSTRY,NELLORE, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.SURESH, S/O.T.VENGAIAH NAIDU, AGED 40 YEARS, HINDU, RIO. SOUTH RAJUPALEM ROAD, ALLIPURAM NELLORE-2, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APERC SCY HYD 2, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. REP.BY ITS SECRETARY 2. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, MINT COMPOUND, SECRETARIAT ROAD, HYDERABAD REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in determining and approving Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) for the Financial Year 2010-2011 and 2011-12 and for 1st quarter of Financial year 2012-13 pursuant to order of 1st respondent as illegal, contrary to Regulation No.1 of 2003 being arbitrary, without jurisdiction or power, and la violation of principles of natural justice and the provisions of Andhra Pradesh eledricily Reform Act, 1998 and Electricity Act, 2003, besides violating petitioners rights garma eed under Art.14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49697 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay the collection of FSA charges by the Respondents for all quarters of financial years 2010-11 & 2011-12 pursuant to the order of 1st respondent in application filed by 2nd respondent for collection of FSA from the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 3. P VINOD KUMAR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39140 of 2012 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events, cause in the present Writ Petition does not survives for further adjudication. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.04.2026 PSA