AMAR NATH v. STATE TH. FIN. COMM. REVENUE AND ORS.
OWP/233/2011 · 2026-08-18
Sanjay Parihar
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 803 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 803 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- OWP No. 233/2011
Amar Nath
.....Petitioner
Through :- None
v/s State & Ors. .....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 18.08.2026
1. Today when the case was taken up for consideration, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting his case any further.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Parihar) Judge
JAMMU 18.08.2026 Sneha
Sr. No. 218