Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2011 DAILYLAW 684 (ORI)

DURGAMADHABA MISHRA v. STATE

CRLMC/4729/2011 · 2026-07-31

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 4729 of 2011 Durga Madhab Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Sri Chiraranjan Satapathy …. Opp. Parties Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 31.07.2026 (Through Hybrid Mode) 27. 1. This CRLMC has been filed challenging the order dated 17.10.2011 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar in G.R. Case No. 811 of 2010 taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 306 and 498 (A) of the IPC against the Petitioner. 2. I have heard Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, learned Additional Standing Counsel. 3. The impugned order so far as it relates to the offence under Section 306 of the IPC is concerned is quashed. But I am satisfied that there are sufficient materials on record for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 498-A of the IPC against the Petitioner. 4. The CRLMC is partly allowed by judgment recorded in separate sheets today. 5. The trial in G.R. Case No. 811 of 2010 shall now proceed against the Petitioner for the offence under Section 498-A of the IPC only. 6. Interim order passed earlier staying further proceeding in G.R. Case No. 811 of 2010 stands vacated. Misc. Case No. 3270 of 2011 stands disposed of. 7. This order be communicated to the learned trial Court. 8. Urgent certified copy of the order be granted on proper application. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Sukanta Designation: Senior Stenographer