Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 18931 of 2011 Niranjan Senapati ..... Petitioner Mr. J.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate -versus- Chairman, OMFED & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.S. Kanungo, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 21.07.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. It is contended that now the President of the Committee of Management of OMFED is also the Chairman of the Society. 4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it to, therefore, humbly eyed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus or issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order by declaring Clause -9 of Annexu 1 to the writ application as contrary to the conditions of the sixth Pay Revision Rules, which is introduced by the state Government and adopted by the Federation and further this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the opposite parties to release the arrear dues of the petitioner as per the calculation made by the opposite parties vide Annexure 2 to the writ application within a time frame so as to save the petitioner and his Page 2 of 2. family members from the un-due harassment and sufferings. And for this act of kindness, as in duty bound, the petitioner shall ever pray.” 5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti