Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2011 DAILYLAW 636 (ORI)

UTKAL GALVANISERS v. ABHIMANYU MALLICK

WP(C)/14123/2011 · 2026-04-21

K R Mohapatra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.14123 of 2011 M/s. Utkal Galvanisers (P) Ltd., Khurda …. Petitioner Mr. Manoj Kumar Rajguru, Advocate -versus- Abhimanyu Mallick … Opposite Party None CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 21.04.2026 11. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. Rajguru, learned Counsel for the Petitioner- Management submits that the demand draft bearing no.225407 dated 07.04.2026 drawn in favour of the Workman namely Abhimanyu Mallick for Rs.50,000/- was received by Mr. Dillip Kumar Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for him on 10.04.2026. A memo to that effect is also available in the case record. 3. None appears for the Workman-Opposite Party at the time of call. 4. This writ petition has been filed assailing the award dated 17.02.2011 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in I.D. Case No.169 of 2008, wherein the Petitioner- Management was directed to pay a lump sum amount of Rs.50,000/- to the Workman in lieu of reinstatement. The award passed under Annexure-1 appears to have been satisfied. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. 5. Interim order dated 17.05.2011 passed in I.A. No.7785 of 2011 stands vacated. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) Judge Banita Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER