CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 in S.A.Sr.No.48822 of 2002 M.G. Annadurai ..Petitioner in all Vs 1. Padmanabha Mudaliar(died) 2. Eakambaram 3. Gunasekaran 4. Panneer Selvam ..Respondents in all CMP.No.897 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1320 days in filing the petition for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent in the above second appeal. CMP.No.898 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent in the above second appeal. CMP.No.899 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to bring on record the respondents 2 to 4 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and rank them as respondents 2 to 4 in the above second appeal. CMP.No.900 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1320 days in filing the petition for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent in CMP.No.21426 of 2003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 __________ Page2 of 4 CMP.No.901 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent in CMP.No.21426 of 2003. CMP.No.902 of 2011 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to bring on record the respondents 2 to 4 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and rank them as respondents 2 to 4 in CMP.No.21426 of 2003. CMP.No.21426 of 2003 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 504 days in filing the above Second Appeal. S.A.Sr.No.48822 of 2002 is filed under Section 100 of CPC., against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.2000 made in A.S.No.158 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.08.1999 made in O.S.No.7 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Cheyyar. For Petitioner(s) in all cases: Ms.L. Poompavai COMMON ORDER It is reported that the sole petitioner passed away on 18.10.2024. Ms.L.Poompavai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 2. No reason has been adduced to condone the delay of 1320 days in filing the second appeal. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 __________ Page3 of 4 dismissed. Consequently, the Second Appeal in S.A.SR.No.48822 of 2002 is also rejected at the SR stage itself. 27-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VKR To 1.The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Sub Judge, Cheyyar. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 __________ Page4 of 4 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. VKR CMP Nos. 897 to 902 of 2011 in S.A.Sr.No.48822 of 2002 27-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis