AS No. 536 of 2011 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 536 of 2011 The Special Tahsildar (LA) Outer Ring Road Project, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai-8. Now Office At Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Chennai-600 092. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. G.Sathyanarayanan S/o Gopal Iyer, No.2/89 Karumariamman Koil Street, Kamaraj Nagar, Avadi, Chennai-79. 2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Devlopment Authority, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- First Appeal filed under under Order XLI Rule 1 r/w/ Section 96 of CPC r/w. Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, to set aside the judgment and decree of the Additional District Court, (FTC-II), Poonamallee in LAOP. No.173 of 2008, dated 28.02.2011. For Appellant(s): Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader For Respondent(s): Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah for R1 Ms.Veena Suresh for R2 Standing Counsel for CMDA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 536 of 2011 __________ Page2 of 4 JUDGMENT The Appeal suit arises out of grant of enhancement of compensation of the lands that were acquired. 2. It is to be noted that apart from the lands of the respondents, the lands of various other persons were also acquired on the very same notification. However, the Awards have been passed in parcels and in respect of the Awardsin Award Nos.19, 16 & 18 of 2006 in respect of acquisition of lands in the very same village for the very same purpose, a Division Bench of this Court in an Appeal suits in AS.Nos.564 of 2011 and etc., batch had upheld the enhanced Award passed by the Reference Court, wherein the Reference Court has adopted the market value of Rs.16,500/- per cent for the lands acquired at Morai Village in the Notification dated 04.12.2003 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. This Court does not find any necessity to depart from the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court which also arise under the very same notification. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court does not find any merits in the Appeal and accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. 20-04-2026 (1/3) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 536 of 2011 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. Additional District Court, (FTC-II), Poonamallee. 2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Devlopment Authority, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3. The Section Officer, VR Records, Madras High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 536 of 2011 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. GBA AS No. 536 of 2011 20-04-2026 (1/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis