Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DAILYLAW 4940 (MAD)

THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) v. LAKSHMIAMMAL

AS/131/2011 · 2026-04-27

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AS No. 131 of 2011 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 131 of 2011 The Special Tahsildar (LA) Unit 1, Outer Ring Road, Project, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Egmore, Chennai 600 008, Now Office At Koyembedu, Chennai. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Lakshmiammal 2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ..Respondent(s) To set aside the Decree passed in LAOP No. 196 of 2009 dated 30.04.2010 on the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram. For Appellant(s): Mr. G.Nanmaran Spl. Govt. Pleader For Respondent(s): No appearance JUDGMENT This Appeal Suit had been filed challenging the enhanced award made by the Reference Court of the lands that were acquired from the 1st respondent. The land had been acquired for the purposes of formation of an outer ring road and the lands of the petitioner were situated at Thirumudivakkam Village. It is to be https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 131 of 2011 __________ Page2 of 4 noted that much extent of land were acquired for the formation of the outer ring road project in the very same village and was the subject matter of various awards which were all even dated 31.12.2001. It is also pertinent to note that the Division Bench of this Court had an occasion to deal with a batch of cases arising out of the enhancement of the award granted in respect of the lands situate in Thirumudivakkam village and confirmed the enhanced compensation arrived at by the Reference Court at Rs.8,000/- per cent. 2. A perusal of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 21.10.2011 made in A.S. Nos. 127 to 130 and 132 to 138 of 2011 would indicate that the Division Bench of this Court has confirmed the findings and reasonings of the Reference Court in arriving at the market value of Rs.8,000/- per cent and on such conclusion, had dismissed the Appeal filed by the Appellant, who is also the appellant in this Appeal Suit. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the Appeal Suit stands dismissed confirming the award made by the Reference Court. No order as to costs. 27-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Maya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 131 of 2011 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 2. The Special Tahsildar (LA) Unit 1, Outer Ring Road, Project, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Egmore, Chennai 600 008, Now Office At Koyembedu, Chennai. 3. The Sub Court, Kancheepuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 131 of 2011 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya AS No. 131 of 2011 Dated : 27-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis